[PATCH] Test sorting order for tr_TR

Petter Reinholdtsen pere@hungry.com
Wed Aug 4 18:54:00 GMT 2004


[Ulrich Drepper]
> Not until the problem is figured out.  The test fails for me, several
> lines are in a different order after the test.

Oh.  It worked for me when I sent the patch a long time ago.  I'll
look into why it fail.  Do you have any more details?

Perhaps I forgot to remove my patch to get the sorting order test to
check _all_ characters in the file, and not ignore "\s+[:(;].*$" when
testing the sorting order of locales.  That is the only related change
I can think of, even though I'm pretty sure I tested the patch on a
clean CVS tree.



More information about the Libc-hacker mailing list