Simplifing tuples

[Paolo Carlini]

chris wrote:

> I'm currently working my way through implementing this, writing a 
> sizeable test suite, etc. I just wondered if anyone had any positive / 
> negative comments on this kind of unfolding?

Something I'm wondering about is whether we can provide to the user a 
*simple* way to *set* (at library build time) the maximum number of 
elements in one tuple type, not just 10, as mandated by the standard, or 
an arbitrary number decided by the implementors: AFAICS this is not 
possible neither with boost reference implementation, neither with your 
proposal. Of course, it's something highly not trivial, preprocessor 
magic and/or sophisticated template metaprogramming techniques would be 
needed, but eventually the QoI would be much higher, IMHO...

Paolo.