string.h vs string.h usage
Earnie Boyd
earnie_boyd@yahoo.com
Wed Dec 5 04:22:00 GMT 2001
Pavel Tsekov wrote:
>
> Any opinions on this topic ?
>
> >
> > > Btw one thing - I've found many #include <strings.h> in
> > > the latest sources - shouldn't this be changed to #include
> > > <string.h> ? mingw doesnt have strings.h. Btw It seems that
> > > if you have string.h you dont need strings.h (I'm under
> > > the impression that string.h include strings.h on linux)
> > >
> > > Does this sound reasonable ?
> >
Right, MinGW provides string.h not strings.h because MS doesn't provide
strings.h.
> > I dunno. Setup builds with -mno-cygwin with FAIK uses all mingw headers,
> > so I don't know whether that is needed or not. Thats probably better
> > asked on-list :}.
> >
>
Setup, strace, possibly more build with the -mno-cygwin switch picking
up the MinGW headers.
> Yes but it gives various include paths from cygwin build and newlib
> build -
> this means that you compile only in this environment (i.e. winsup env).
> If you
> try only mingw it wont work :)
>
> However I've fixed that for me locally
There should be nothing to fix. If there is then you've done something
wrong in the setup or building the program. Using -mno-cygwin should
only give you MinGW headers and never the Cygwin headers. The only way
I can think of that this would happen is if you also added a
-I/usr/include to the gcc build options or if you modified the gcc
source and rebuilt it yourself.
Earnie.
_________________________________________________________
Do You Yahoo!?
Get your free @yahoo.com address at http://mail.yahoo.com
More information about the Cygwin-apps
mailing list