Robots binary package
Earnie Boyd
earnie_boyd@yahoo.com
Fri Dec 28 10:12:00 GMT 2001
Your reference doesn't say that _ALL_ packages need a README. What's
difficult with Robots? Your reference also doesn't say anything about
adding how the package was configured to a README. Your reference was
only dealing with where to put the READMEs that need to be created. I
don't see a need for a README for all packages. I don't see a need for
a README for Robots.
Earnie.
Robert Collins wrote:
>
> The configure flags for the package perhaps. I thought that having
> /usr/doc/Cygwin/foo-readme was standard for binary packages - see this
> thread (Started by you :])
>
> http://cygwin.com/ml/cygwin-apps/2000-06/msg00021.html
>
> Rob
> ===
> ----- Original Message -----
> From: "Corinna Vinschen" <vinschen@redhat.com>
> To: <cygwin-apps@sources.redhat.com>
> Sent: Friday, December 28, 2001 9:41 PM
> Subject: Re: Robots binary package
>
> > On Fri, Dec 28, 2001 at 04:56:19PM +1100, Robert Collins wrote:
> > > Is missing /usr/doc/Cygwin/Robots-2.0.1.README.
> > >
> > > Is that intentional?
> >
> > Yes. What do you want to read?
> >
> > Corinna
> >
> > --
> > Corinna Vinschen Please, send mails regarding Cygwin
> to
> > Cygwin Developer
> mailto:cygwin@cygwin.com
> > Red Hat, Inc.
> >
_________________________________________________________
Do You Yahoo!?
Get your free @yahoo.com address at http://mail.yahoo.com
More information about the Cygwin-apps
mailing list