-src package standard: proposal #5 and #5a

[Robert Collins]

> -----Original Message-----
> From: Christopher Faylor [ mailto:cgf@redhat.com ]
> The last I heard, as of last Friday when you sent email about 
> "clickable
> categories", we were going with clickable categories.

This goes back quite a few months to when the categories code was first
written. I raised the issue of metapackages (as I call them) and even
went so far as to test one - see the cygwin developers list archives.
It's not a new thing, and not even surprising.
 
> Thanks for playing along.  In other words, this problem has nothing to
> do with what we're talking about.
>
> 
> You're arguing that we can't use the word "All" because someone will
> be upset when gvim isn't installed.

Hmm. I thought I was argueing that we can't use the word all because -
eventually - we won't be able to satisfy that. However as I said, I only
code the software. I'll hack up clickable categories this week.
 
Rob