unversioned tarballs - do we need to support them (as far as prev/curr/test goes)
Christopher Faylor
cgf@redhat.com
Thu Nov 29 07:48:00 GMT 2001
On Thu, Nov 29, 2001 at 03:11:12PM +1100, Robert Collins wrote:
>Ignore this, time for a break I think.
Actually, I think it is a good question. I have had a versioned byacc
tar ball ready to go for a while. I'm not sure why mt doesn't have a
version already.
Unfortunately, I don't think that we can get rid of the unversioned stuff
for a while since people could still have unversioned tar balls sitting
around. We could announce it as deprecated, though.
cgf
More information about the Cygwin-apps
mailing list