proposal for GNU emacs 21.2 package
Fri Aug 9 07:39:00 GMT 2002
On Fri, 2002-08-09 at 00:48, Jason Tishler wrote:
> On Wed, Aug 07, 2002 at 05:46:32PM -0400, Nicholas Wourms wrote:
> > I know its supposed to be part of setup.exe, but with Rob being
> > indefinately tied up, I think this is the most prudent step at this
> > point.
> Actually, I'm suppose to be adding rebase to setup.exe not Rob.
> > So Jason, if you put up a package for rebase, its got my vote.
> Do others share Nicholas's views on this issue?
I'm completely impartial. Well nearly: I think that a separate utility
is a good thing regardless, as long as the config file format is stable,
or easily updatable :}.
-------------- next part --------------
A non-text attachment was scrubbed...
Size: 189 bytes
Desc: This is a digitally signed message part
More information about the Cygwin-apps