proposal for GNU emacs 21.2 package

[Robert Collins]

On Sat, 2002-08-10 at 01:09, Jason Tishler wrote:
> Rob,
> 
> On Sat, Aug 10, 2002 at 12:39:39AM +1000, Robert Collins wrote:
> > On Fri, 2002-08-09 at 00:48, Jason Tishler wrote:
> > > Do others share Nicholas's views on this issue?
> > 
> > I'm completely impartial. Well nearly: I think that a separate utility
> > is a good thing regardless, as long as the config file format is
> > stable, or easily updatable :}.
> 
> The stand-alone rebase utilities that have been "floating" around do not
> persist anything.  Hence, the config file is easily update-able.  :,)

Good enough for me :]

Rob

-------------- next part --------------
A non-text attachment was scrubbed...
Name: signature.asc
Type: application/pgp-signature
Size: 189 bytes
Desc: This is a digitally signed message part
URL: <http://cygwin.com/pipermail/cygwin-apps/attachments/20020809/0e605a9c/attachment.sig>