proposal for GNU emacs 21.2 package
Fri Aug 9 08:28:00 GMT 2002
On Sat, 2002-08-10 at 01:09, Jason Tishler wrote:
> On Sat, Aug 10, 2002 at 12:39:39AM +1000, Robert Collins wrote:
> > On Fri, 2002-08-09 at 00:48, Jason Tishler wrote:
> > > Do others share Nicholas's views on this issue?
> > I'm completely impartial. Well nearly: I think that a separate utility
> > is a good thing regardless, as long as the config file format is
> > stable, or easily updatable :}.
> The stand-alone rebase utilities that have been "floating" around do not
> persist anything. Hence, the config file is easily update-able. :,)
Good enough for me :]
-------------- next part --------------
A non-text attachment was scrubbed...
Size: 189 bytes
Desc: This is a digitally signed message part
More information about the Cygwin-apps