[nasm packaging review] was Re: Pending packages status
Pavel Tsekov
ptsekov@gmx.net
Mon Dec 30 10:01:00 GMT 2002
On Mon, 30 Dec 2002, Max Bowsher wrote:
> I do think that a version number should uniquely identify a version, though.
> A possibility that was not considered last time this was discussed is to
> start the reviewing at -0.1, going -0.2, -0.3, etc., and then bump to -1 on
> release.
>
> Feel free to ignore me if you don't want to reopen this discussion.
Hello, Max
Just to let you know that I do not want to ignore your opinion, nor do I
want to ignore any other peoples' opinion. I just do not have strong
opinion on this topic. So, as far as I'm concerned I'm trying to follow
the instructions at http://cygwin.com/setup.html. If as a result of a
discussion on this list this instructions do change, I'll follow the new
instructions whatever they are.
More information about the Cygwin-apps
mailing list