vmstat
Christopher Faylor
cgf@redhat.com
Thu Jul 4 12:29:00 GMT 2002
On Thu, Jul 04, 2002 at 02:00:06PM -0400, Nicholas Wourms wrote:
>Chris January wrote:
>>>I suspect that this must have something to do with binutils. I changed
>>>the alignments at David Billinghurst's suggestion to accommodate java.
>>>If this is causing problems, however, I'll change them back.
>>>
>>That's what I was referring to.
>>
>Is it possible for you to work around this? I believe the alignment
>change is necessary for a working libgcj/gcj suite. It would be nice
>to have both working properly...
Yes, I agree. On thinking about this, it seems like the header files are
probably in error if they are sensitive to this.
For the record. I changed this:
#define COFF_DEFAULT_SECTION_ALIGNMENT_POWER (2)
to this:
#define COFF_DEFAULT_SECTION_ALIGNMENT_POWER (4)
but I confess that I didn't give much thought to what it did. I thought
it just changed the alignment of sections rather than the alignment
within sections.
Now that I think of it, the way I did things would change this only
for native compilers, not cross compilers. That's not right.
Maybe this explains the gcc errors that I've been seeing.
cgf
More information about the Cygwin-apps
mailing list