please update libXML (undefined references)
Robert Collins
robert.collins@syncretize.net
Mon Jul 22 09:02:00 GMT 2002
> -----Original Message-----
> From: cygwin-apps-owner@cygwin.com
> [mailto:cygwin-apps-owner@cygwin.com] On Behalf Of Jason Tishler
> Sent: Monday, 22 July 2002 11:45 PM
> To: cygwin-apps@cygwin.com
> Subject: Re: please update libXML (undefined references)
>
>
> Rob,
>
>
> > I've uploaded libxml regardless of this issue. A because the python
> > bindings are new, and B because cygfoo.dll is the standard
> for cygwin
> > .dll's. libtool is correct, python incorrect.
>
> Stating that Python is "incorrect" above is a little strong -- I would
> prefer "Python does not work that way" instead. Note that if one uses
> Distutils (i.e., the recommended way to build Python shared
> extension in
> a platform independent way), then the "right thing" will happen.
Granted. Not being a python user, I'm really very dependent on patches
to make libxml do The Right Thing.
It seems to me however, that libfoomod.dll will collide with mingw
pythons - I don't see how the logic for .dll naming should be different
for python than the platform as a whole.
Having said that, I'll happily accept a patch to the cygwin libxml
makefile.am's to get the correct file name, and if it's something that
is truly portable then I'll do what I can to get it included in the
stock libxml distribution as well.
Rob
More information about the Cygwin-apps
mailing list