New setup.exe snapshot 184.108.40.206
Mon Jun 10 08:01:00 GMT 2002
> -----Original Message-----
> From: email@example.com
> [mailto:firstname.lastname@example.org] On Behalf Of Earnie Boyd
> Sent: Monday, 10 June 2002 11:37 PM
> > > Perhaps a #define UNICODE before #include <windows.h> would help?
> > We can't rely on the MS layer for unicode on win9x. Doesn't
> the above
> > require that? I hesitate to look at multiple binaries either :[.
> If you wish to continue supporting W9x, and I suppose you do,
> perhaps an
> alternative binary would suffice, I.E.: A binary with UNICODE and a
> binary without UNICODE?
I'd rather not do that, at least until we have less wishlist items. The
more complexity 'out there', the more support issues. Plus I've not
tried a UNICODE build, so it'll probably raise many more issues all of
More information about the Cygwin-apps