New setup.exe snapshot 2.249.2.2

[Robert Collins]

> -----Original Message-----
> From: cygwin-apps-owner@cygwin.com 
> [mailto:cygwin-apps-owner@cygwin.com] On Behalf Of Earnie Boyd
> Sent: Monday, 10 June 2002 11:37 PM

> > > Perhaps a #define UNICODE before #include <windows.h> would help?
> > 
> > We can't rely on the MS layer for unicode on win9x. Doesn't 
> the above
> > require that? I hesitate to look at multiple binaries either :[.
> > 
> 
> If you wish to continue supporting W9x, and I suppose you do, 
> perhaps an
> alternative binary would suffice, I.E.: A binary with UNICODE and a
> binary without UNICODE?

I'd rather not do that, at least until we have less wishlist items. The
more complexity 'out there', the more support issues. Plus I've not
tried a UNICODE build, so it'll probably raise many more issues all of
it's own.

Rob