rebasing new packages?!

[Robert Collins]

> -----Original Message-----
> From: Charles Wilson [mailto:cwilson@ece.gatech.edu] 
> Sent: Friday, May 03, 2002 10:45 AM

> Well, now libstdc++ is allowed, right? (assuming you can find and 
> install one, since nobody's stepped forward with mingwlibs-for-cygwin 
> package).

Exactly, in fact libstdc++ is required.
 
> Not having looked at Jason's code, I can't comment on the design; 
> however, it shouldn't be terribly difficult to refactor it 
> away from STL 
> and just use "basic" libstdc++ stuff, right?  I mean, Jason didn't go 
> absolutely template-crazy, did he?

The design wasn't STL bound, it's more at the pattern level rather than
which specific container he used. It's all in the archives.

Rob