rebasing new packages?!

Jason Tishler jason@tishler.net
Fri May 3 06:27:00 GMT 2002


On Fri, May 03, 2002 at 12:58:04PM +1000, Danny Smith wrote:
> If your just talking about STL in the strict sense, you shouldn't need
> libstdc++.a.  The templated STL lives in the headers. That's the virtue of
> templated classes.  Char specializations for [Non-]Standard iostreams and
> string classes live in libstdc++.a but they are not templated pre-3.0

Does the above imply that it would easy to add STL to gcc -mno-cygwin?

Thanks,
Jason



More information about the Cygwin-apps mailing list