Setup version in setup.ini
Igor Pechtchanski
pechtcha@cs.nyu.edu
Wed Apr 9 18:37:00 GMT 2003
On Wed, 9 Apr 2003, Max Bowsher wrote:
> Igor Pechtchanski wrote:
> > On Wed, 9 Apr 2003, Max Bowsher wrote:
> >
> >> Christopher Faylor wrote:
> >>> On Wed, Apr 09, 2003 at 12:50:03PM -0400, Igor Pechtchanski wrote:
> >>>> Shouldn't setup.ini be updated to reflect the new setup version
> >>>> available?
> >>>> See <http://cygwin.com/ml/cygwin/2003-04/msg00813.html>.
> >>>
> >>> It's supposed to be automatic. Apparently someone removed the version
> >>> marker strings in setup.exe that upset relies on for decoding the
> >>> version. I think this happens in nearly every setup release.
> >>
> >> I suspect the markers are intact, but masked by the upx compression.
> >> Max.
> >
> > This is puzzling. There is an option in upx that disables compression for
> > resources ("--compress-resouces=0"). Using it does add about 11k to the
> > size of the executable. However, even with that option, "strings
> > setup.exe" doesn't show any of the resources... Am I understanding the
> > intent of the option correctly? If not, what am I missing?
>
> The resources are stored in Unicode. Try strings -el.
Yep, got it. Thanks.
> But the version marker isn't a resource anyway.
> Max.
Should it be? I don't know much about resources, but can we have two .rc
files, one containing only the version (i.e., instead of setup_version.c
generate a setup_version.rc)? Alternatively, I know the Windows EXE
header has a slot for an application-defined version... If upx keeps that
intact, we could look into that approach.
Igor
P.S. How did it work before? upx has been used for a while now, hasn't it?
--
http://cs.nyu.edu/~pechtcha/
|\ _,,,---,,_ pechtcha@cs.nyu.edu
ZZZzz /,`.-'`' -. ;-;;,_ igor@watson.ibm.com
|,4- ) )-,_. ,\ ( `'-' Igor Pechtchanski
'---''(_/--' `-'\_) fL a.k.a JaguaR-R-R-r-r-r-.-.-. Meow!
Knowledge is an unending adventure at the edge of uncertainty.
-- Leto II
More information about the Cygwin-apps
mailing list