gcc package idea for consideration.

[Christopher Faylor]

On Sun, Apr 27, 2003 at 04:09:16AM +1000, Gareth Pearce wrote:
>>Ahh, I hate it when I'm right, I suspected this responce.  I would
>>suggest a gcc-testing version based on the mingw branch - but, that
>>would basically be a gcc package anyway.  (since cygwin-mingw doesnt
>>appear to have a 3.3 or 3.4 based branch yet.)
>
>replying to myself here (at 4am noless).  I realise the above comment
>is silly - since theres not like theres a gcc 3.2.3 cygwin-mingw branch
>either.  (AFAICT) So either way i'd be having some fun doing some merge
>(yay, i just love merging).  (although 3.3 would be harder, maybe it
>would be a better experience).

I don't mind doing the merge to 3.3 if you're willing to be the maintainer.
I've already started the dialog with Danny about how to go about this anyway.

cgf