Wed Dec 3 13:49:00 GMT 2003
Harold L Hunt II wrote:
> Question for other maintainers: ImageMagick defaults to building as a
> static library... I have not yet tried to build it as a shared library;
> does anyone have an instant educated guess as to whether or not it will
> be a good idea to pursue a shared library? It would save me a lot of
> wasted effort if someone told me right now that "ImageMagick won't work
> as a shared lib on Cygwin because foo isn't a shared library" or that
> ImageMagick is known to use undefined symbols at link time. Thanks.
I built IM shared once upon a time. I believe all I needed to do was
relibtoolize, but I'll check.
Vote pro, BTW.
More information about the Cygwin-apps