[ITP] ImageMagick

[Charles Wilson]

Harold L Hunt II wrote:

> Question for other maintainers: ImageMagick defaults to building as a 
> static library... I have not yet tried to build it as a shared library; 
> does anyone have an instant educated guess as to whether or not it will 
> be a good idea to pursue a shared library?  It would save me a lot of 
> wasted effort if someone told me right now that "ImageMagick won't work 
> as a shared lib on Cygwin because foo isn't a shared library" or that 
> ImageMagick is known to use undefined symbols at link time.  Thanks.

I built IM shared once upon a time.  I believe all I needed to do was 
relibtoolize, but I'll check.

Vote pro, BTW.

--
Chuck