tetex versioning problem [Re: Updated: lilypond-1.6.8-2 for Cygwin]

[Max Bowsher]

Jan Nieuwenhuizen wrote:
> I've been alerted by Rick Rankin about the fact that Cygwin's
> setup.ini lists the new tetex-2.0.1-1 as [prev] and the old
> tetex-20020911-1 as [curr].  My personal setup.ini script got it
> 'right' (in this case) when I tested it (ages ago), so I didn't think
> of it lateron.
> 
> Would adding a [curr] marker to tetex-2.0.1's setup.hints be enough
> (or do we need epoch support in version numbering)?  How do we arrange
> this?

http://cygwin.com/setup.html#setup.hint shows the correct syntax.

Max.