[ITP] rebase

[Nicholas Wourms]

rbcollins@cygwin.com wrote:
> On Sat, 2003-01-25 at 22:56, Max Bowsher wrote:
> 
> 
> 
>>>I hope that using the term "non-persistent" does not delay the voting
>>>process...
>>
>>Definitely not.
>>I vote "pro" regardless of what name we choose.
> 
> 
> I second this. In fact, IMO this vote should really be a formality -
> this is core infrastructure after all.
> 
> Rob

As do I!!!  [After all I was the one who stirred up the fuss 
in the firstplace ;-)]

Pierre, can you test this on your winme box and see if it 
will allow you to run apache?  I've got too many "orphaned" 
dlls lurking about to be a reliable candidate for testing 
(no, apache still won't run here).

Cheers,
Nicholas