[ITP] rebase

[Christopher Faylor]

On Sun, Jan 26, 2003 at 08:53:09AM +1100, Robert Collins wrote:
>On Sun, 2003-01-26 at 08:45, Ralf Habacker wrote:
>> > > Should this rebase maybe be a Cygwin, not MinGW version?
>> > > (So that we can use POSIX paths with it?)
>> >
>> > No - you need to be able to rebase cygwin1.dll too.
>> 
>> As far as I know is the cygwin1.dll not designed to be rebased.
>
>There was a long thread on the devel list about this. Cygwin1.dll needs
>to be at the same base address in every process. But that address can be
>anything.

Correct!  If things aren't working that way then that's a bug.

cgf