[ITP] rebase

Max Bowsher maxb@ukf.net
Sat Jan 25 23:02:00 GMT 2003

Charles Wilson wrote:
> Robert Collins wrote:
>> I second this. In fact, IMO this vote should really be a formality -
>> this is core infrastructure after all.
> "pro" from me.  Actually, rebase probably should be in the 'Base'
> category, IMO.

What exactly are the criteria for "Base"?

Whilst we are talking about it, I think "ncurses" might no longer need to be
"Base", now there is "libncurses?".

Since rebasing is not necessary in many circumstances, should rebase be
"Base"? It seems unnecessary to force it to be installed, especially as it
is so easy to install packages when you need them.


More information about the Cygwin-apps mailing list