[ITP] rebase

[Robert Collins]

On Sun, 2003-01-26 at 14:47, Jason Tishler wrote:
> On Sat, Jan 25, 2003 at 11:01:45PM +1100, Robert Collins wrote:
> > I second this. In fact, IMO this vote should really be a formality -
> > this is core infrastructure after all.
> 
> I wrestled with the category and ended up with "Admin".  Should the
> category be "Base" instead?

It's not *needed*, so base is inappropriate. Any post install scripts
that need rebase can just depend on it.

Rob
-- 
GPG key available at: <http://users.bigpond.net.au/robertc/keys.txt>.
-------------- next part --------------
A non-text attachment was scrubbed...
Name: signature.asc
Type: application/pgp-signature
Size: 189 bytes
Desc: This is a digitally signed message part
URL: <http://cygwin.com/pipermail/cygwin-apps/attachments/20030126/5981ece9/attachment.sig>