Sun Jan 26 05:27:00 GMT 2003
On Sat, Jan 25, 2003 at 11:13:52PM -0500, Jason Tishler wrote:
>> Should this rebase maybe be a Cygwin, not MinGW version? (So that we
>> can use POSIX paths with it?)
>My very first version was a Cygwin app. I converted it to Mingw when
>Chuck pointed out imagehlp.dll is dependent on msvcrt.dll. Now that I'm
>using Ralf's imagehelper library we have a choice (unless rebasing
>cygwin1.dll is a requirement). Although, I waffle on the Cygwin vs.
>Mingw issues, I'm leaning toward Mingw.
The only reason I can think of to make it a cygwin app (and I think it
is a powerful one) is for the path issues. If someone wants to rebase
cygwin, maybe the README could tell them how to do that, e.g., make a
copy, rebase that, use Windows tools to copy the rebased DLL back to
I don't think that rebasing cygwin should show up too often.
More information about the Cygwin-apps