Mon Jan 27 19:46:00 GMT 2003
On Mon, Jan 27, 2003 at 05:21:57PM -0000, Max Bowsher wrote:
>Problem: If it was Cygwin, it couldn't use any other Cygwin dll - like
>cygpopt-0.dll (it might need to rebase them).
>It's somewhat an unanswered question whether rebasing cygwin1.dll is
Useful? In some cases, maybe.
Harmful? No. If it is, it's a bug.
>IMO, we already have strace & cygcheck that don't do Cygwin paths.
I really think that a general purpose utility like rebase, which could be
used repeatedly (as opposed to occasionally for debugging purposes), should
be a cygwin program. Linking libraries statically should solve the problem
of attempting to rebase a 'linked in' DLL.
More information about the Cygwin-apps