Pending package status (11 Jul 2003)

[Nicholas Wourms]

cgf@redhat.com wrote:

> On Fri, Jul 11, 2003 at 03:34:38PM +0100, Elfyn McBratney wrote:
> 
>>>>@ cygbuild
>>>>
>>>>date   : 12 Jun 2003
>>>>version: 2003.0612-1
>>>>status : not reviewed
>>>>notes  : http://cygwin.com/ml/cygwin-apps/2003-06/msg00104.html
>>>>         http://cygwin.com/ml/cygwin-apps/2003-06/msg00105.html
>>>>votes  : 0
>>>
>>>Umm, hasn't this been vetoed?
>>
>>No Chris withdrew his vetoe.
> 
> 
> No, I did not withdraw the veto.  I have been vetoing this consistently
> since before it even showed up in this list.
> 

Yes, I totally agree.  I can't understand why the maintainer doesn't 
just use the script by Chuck?  Cygbuild is totally redundant.  Why 
doesn't he merge any improvements in Cygbuild with it?  That would make 
the most sense and allivate even more confusion...

Cheers,
Nicholas