Pending package status (11 Jul 2003)

[Nicholas Wourms]

elfyn@emcb.co.uk wrote:

> On Fri, 11 Jul 2003, Christopher Faylor wrote:
> 
> 
>>On Fri, Jul 11, 2003 at 10:03:12AM -0400, Igor Pechtchanski wrote:
>>
>>>>@ cygbuild
>>>>
>>>>date   : 12 Jun 2003
>>>>version: 2003.0612-1
>>>>status : not reviewed
>>>>notes  : http://cygwin.com/ml/cygwin-apps/2003-06/msg00104.html
>>>>         http://cygwin.com/ml/cygwin-apps/2003-06/msg00105.html
>>>>votes  : 0
>>>
>>>Umm, hasn't this been vetoed?
>>
>>Yes.
> 
> 
> Right. Sorry. Just the using cygbuild (as apposed to gbs) is allowed.

While technically this is true, I really can't see the difference 
between the two.  For simplicity's sake, using a common script for 
method II would be most helpful.  I'm willing to do the conversion for 
gc & cabextract.

Cheers,
Nicholas