Trivial ChangeLog amendment for setup-200206 branch

[Robert Collins]

On Fri, 2003-03-21 at 07:25, Max Bowsher wrote:
> Christopher Faylor wrote:
> > On Thu, Mar 20, 2003 at 08:12:21PM -0000, Max Bowsher wrote:
> >> I was just working on extracting the correct changelog entries for the
> >> release notes for the upcoming setup release, when I discovered an
> >> accidental deletion of an entry.
> >>
> >> OK to apply this to the 2.249 branch?
> >
> > I think that ChangeLog entries about ChangeLog entries are rather
> > redundant. Since a ChangeLog is documentation, I don't see any reason to
> > be self-referential.
> 
> I wanted to document that although the ChangeLog entry had been backed out,
> the code changes had not.
> 
> How do you think it is best to do this?

Max, don't agonise over it. Your first suggestion was fine by me, so
please, commit it.

FWIW I'm also happy with what Chris suggested...

Rob
-- 
GPG key available at: <http://users.bigpond.net.au/robertc/keys.txt>.
-------------- next part --------------
A non-text attachment was scrubbed...
Name: signature.asc
Type: application/pgp-signature
Size: 189 bytes
Desc: This is a digitally signed message part
URL: <http://cygwin.com/pipermail/cygwin-apps/attachments/20030323/148deaf0/attachment.sig>