astksh review
Elfyn McBratney
elfyn@ubertales.co.uk
Mon May 19 18:47:00 GMT 2003
On Mon, 19 May 2003, Dario Alcocer wrote:
> On Mon, May 19, 2003 at 09:09:46AM +0100, Elfyn McBratney wrote:
> > I created the ksh symlink so users wouldn't have to edit their shebang
> > lines to point to `/bin/pdksh' but now we have the proper ksh (available)
> > I suppose I could get rid of it. What's the feeling?
> >
> > We could do one of
> >
> > 1. Remove the ksh symlink from the pdksh package.
> > 2. Rename ksh.exe (in astksh) to astksh.exe and have a ksh symlink to
> > astksh.exe
> > 3. Maybe only two options. :-)
> >
> > these?
>
> How about:
> 4. Deprecate the pdksh package.
>
> Now that we have the real, honest-to-goodness ksh, do we really need
> pdksh? Just a suggestion...
If someone wants to remove the package it's cool by me, I'll still keep it
around, though. pdksh is light weight and fit's my (not so fully blown)
needs. :-)
Elfyn
--
Elfyn McBratney
Systems Administrator
ABCtales.com
More information about the Cygwin-apps
mailing list