TCM package layout

[Daniel Boesswetter]

Hi Chuck,

[sorry for the delay, but I've been busy lately]

Charles Wilson wrote:

>
> The source package is a little strange.  It doesn't seem to follow 
> either method 1 or method 2.  However, it's very close to method 2 -- 
> just a little tweaking.  Daniel, see http://www.cygwin.com/setup.html 
> for more info.

Hm, I think it is *very* close to method 1, not method 2. What's wrong?

>
> The binary package is laid out thus:
>
> /usr/X11R6/bin/
> /usr/X11R6/man/
> /usr/X11R6/share/tcm-2.20/ < runtime help >
> /usr/X11R6/doc/tcm-2.20/  < html docu >
> /usr/share/doc/Cygwin/tcm-2.20.README
>
> So, here's the question for the list.  For the cygwin-specific README 
> in a X-related package, where should it go?
>
> /usr/share/doc/Cygwin/  like "normal" packages?
> /usr/X11/doc/Cygwin/ ?
> /usr/X11/share/doc/Cygwin/ ?
>
> I lean toward /usr/X11/doc/Cygwin/  just in the interests of keeping 
> all things X-related under /usr/X11R6/...

I don't have any strong sentiment concerning this. I guess it's easier 
for users to have all READMEs in one place (/usr, because he/she will 
search it himself) whereas man-pages and executables are searched by the 
machine rather than by humans and can thus be placed in /usr/X11R6.

I won't move the README unless someone (preferrably a majority on this 
list) tells me to.

Opinions?

Best regards,
Daniel

>
> Subject to resolution of that issue, and slight reworking of the 
> source package to conform with method2 (basically, just adapt the 
> generic-build-script), this looks good.
>
> -- 
> Chuck
>
>
>
>
>
>