[Review 2 - Good to go] gd: A graphics library for fast image creation

[Dr. Volker Zell]

>>>>> "Gareth" == Gareth Pearce <tilps@hotmail.com> writes:

    >> Hmm... just noticed that you have libgd2 and libgd2-devel... I was under
    >> the impression that you should stick the DLL version in the libgd
    >> package name, which you did, but I thought that the DLL version number
    >> was *not* included in the -devel package name.
    >> 
    >> It seems to me that the devel package should be called:
    >> 
    >> libgd-devel
    >> 
    >> 
    >> Anyone care to comment on this?

    Gareth> It would be nice to say that versioned devels are never necessary, but
    Gareth> unless the internals of the package are designed so as to be able to coexist
    Gareth> with future version devels (like libgd2 would be), there isn't any point
    Gareth> versioning them, and hence should not be so.

I'll change it to not include the version number.

Ciao
  Volker