[Review - Good to go] suite3270
Harold L Hunt II
huntharo@msu.edu
Sun Nov 30 06:26:00 GMT 2003
Harold L Hunt II wrote:
> Peter,
>
> Peter A. Castro wrote:
>
>> Hi Harold,
>> I've fixed item #2 concerning the install phase of building. As
>> discussed, issue #1 will be left, as is, as it does not effect the
>> packaging process. If you would, please re-pull from the same URLs and
>> re-test/review. Thanks!
>
>
> Okay, I just rebuilt the package. Here is my review:
>
> Good to go!
>
> The only question I have before uploading is how the files need to be
> laid out. You gave a flat-file structure below, whereas we will
> probably need something more like:
>
> suite3270/setup.hint
> suite3270/suite3270-3.2.20-1.tar.bz2
> suite3270/suite3270-3.2.20-1-src.tar.bz2
> suite3270/pr3287/pr3287-3.2.20-1.tar.bz2
> suite3270/pr3287/setup.hint
> suite3270/s3270/s3270-3.2.20-1.tar.bz2
> suite3270/s3270/setup.hint
> suite3270/tcl3270/setup.hint
> suite3270/tcl3270/tcl3270-3.2.20-1.tar.bz2
> suite3270/x3270/setup.hint
> suite3270/x3270/x3270-3.2.20-1.tar.bz2
Ugh... I just noticed that your all command is as follows:
all) prep && conf && build && install && \
pkg && spkg && finish ; STATUS=$? ;;
You don't have a 'strip' command in there; I checked the s3270 package
and noticed that s3270.exe is 484 KiB, versus 170 KiB after running it
through 'strip'.
I suggest fixing this by adding 'strip' to the 'all' command and
re-running the 'all' command. I will upload the package tomorrow after
you have posted a stripped version.
Harold
More information about the Cygwin-apps
mailing list