fontconfig 2.2.0 - Ready for review

[Harold L Hunt II]

Gerrit P. Haase wrote:

> Hallo Harold,
> 
> 
>>fontconfig
>>==========
>>libfontconfig1
>>==============
>>libfontconfig-devel
>>===================
> 
> 
> The binary packages:
> 
> + Executables are running.
> 
> - No postinstall script
> 
> - And in the package included (which is wrong, should  be created by a
> postinstall script and only install them if the user has it not in
> place): 
> etc/fonts/
> etc/fonts/fonts.conf
> etc/fonts/fonts.dtd
> etc/fonts/local.conf

I haven't done this before.  I will have to find an example of it somewhere.

> The source package:
> 
> + It configures, builds, ... ok. (The lndir trick is amazing;-)

Heh... it is a trick I have often used when a package won't let me build 
out of the source tree.  Others will probably chastise me for it, but it 
has worked well for me for over two years.

> - The patch includes the autotools temp directory:
>   fontconfig-2.2.0/autom4te.cache/
> BTW, this should be patched in the generic build-script to be excluded
> when running diff. 

Okay, I can exclude that in the build script and try it again.

By the way, what is the policy when making pre-release chagnes like 
this.  Do most people bump the package number from -1 to -2 or is that 
why I should be including md5sums?

> I vote pro fontconfig.

Thanks,

Harold