new package proposal : CLISP
Tue Sep 9 15:25:00 GMT 2003
On Tue, 9 Sep 2003, Sam Steingold wrote:
> > * In message <Pine.GSO.firstname.lastname@example.org>
> > * On the subject of "Re: new package proposal : CLISP"
> > * Sent on Tue, 9 Sep 2003 10:43:24 -0400 (EDT)
> > * Honorable Igor Pechtchanski <...> writes:
> > On Tue, 9 Sep 2003, Sam Steingold wrote:
> > > > Binary package seems good, though it doesn't install cygwin-specific
> > > > documentation.
> > >
> > > /usr/share/doc/clisp/* is all the doc there is.
> > > or do you want .../clisp-2.31/?
> > > (everyone is different - cygwin/RH, debian ...)
> > According to <http://cygwin.com/setup.html#package_contents>, a
> > Cygwin-specific README is required. Some maintainers also include
> > port notes and other Cygwin-specific information (e.g., package
> > contents) in that file (see the generic readme file on the above page
> > for an example). It's probably acceptable to have a one-liner
> > referring to the non-Cygwin-specific documentation in
> > /usr/share/doc/clisp.
> $ ls /usr/share/doc/Cygwin/ | wc -l
> $ cygcheck -c | wc -l
> so only 20% of packages supply this cygwin-specific README.
Try also "ls /usr/doc/Cygwin/ | wc -l" -- some older packages still have
their Cygwin-specific docs there. That still doesn't cover all the
packages, but will probably bring the total to well over 50%.
> Oh well, I can throw something together.
> > > > Source package: it doesn't seems to have any specific instruction nor
> > > > a CYGWIN-PATCHES subdir.
> > >
> > > nothing cygwin-specific is needed.
> > > unix/INSTALL is all you need.
> > > CLISP builds OOTB.
> > CYGWIN-PATCHES should contain at least the Cygwin-specific README (see
> > above) and setup.hint.
> so you want me to keep a separate 7MB source tar file just for the sake
> of redundantly redundant identical information already contained
> Oh well, disk space is cheap.
If you use the generic-build-script (I don't know whether you do or not),
you'd have to keep one anyway, at least long enough to upload it... ;-)
> > > > Last but not least, targetting cygwin-1.5.x is now a requirement
> > >
> > > Oh boy....
> > >
> > > I upgraded to 1.5.3 last Friday and I cannot _configure_!
> > > the configure scripts fail with:
> > >
> > > ./configure --with-module=syscalls --with-module=regexp --build --fsstnd=redhat --with-module=dirkey --with-module=bindings/win32 --with-module=clx/new-clx --with-libsigsegv-prefix=/usr/local/libsigsegv-cygwin build-O
> > > ......
> > > executing /cygdrive/d/gnu/clisp/current/build-O/avcall/configure --srcdir=../../ffcall/avcall --with-module=syscalls --with-module=regexp --with-module=dirkey --with-module=bindings/win32 --with-module=clx/new-clx --with-libsigsegv-prefix=/usr/local/libsigsegv-cygwin --cache-file=../config.cache
> > > configure: error: invalid package name: module
> > >
> > > the cause is an `expr' call which unexpectedly fails.
> > > if I add any other `expr' call right before the failing one, it works...
> > >
> > > advice?!
> > Umm, sorry, I'm not as configure-savvy as I'd like to be... Do you
> > use autoconf?
> > If so, did you re-run it after upgrading?
> > It would help knowing which versions of autotools you have installed.
> autoconf 2.57a-1 OK
> automake 1.7.5a-1 OK
Aren't those "test" versions? Do you get the same problem with the "curr"
ones? In any case, I'll just let some autotool expert (Chuck?) speak up
on this one.
|\ _,,,---,,_ email@example.com
ZZZzz /,`.-'`' -. ;-;;,_ firstname.lastname@example.org
|,4- ) )-,_. ,\ ( `'-' Igor Pechtchanski, Ph.D.
'---''(_/--' `-'\_) fL a.k.a JaguaR-R-R-r-r-r-.-.-. Meow!
"I have since come to realize that being between your mentor and his route
to the bathroom is a major career booster." -- Patrick Naughton
More information about the Cygwin-apps