Fri Sep 19 19:08:00 GMT 2003
Christopher Faylor writes:
> What do people think about this? I would like to be consistent in package
> naming and it seems like most packages put their binaries in a package sans
> -bin. There is an empty tetex package but I don't understand the need
> to complicate things this way.
I just copied Debian's package layout, except that Cygwin needs the
'root' package. Tetex is built from two source packages, which
complicates matters a bit.
Jan Nieuwenhuizen <email@example.com> | GNU LilyPond - The music typesetter
http://www.xs4all.nl/~jantien | http://www.lilypond.org
More information about the Cygwin-apps