clisp is in section misc?

Sam Steingold
Mon Sep 22 14:36:00 GMT 2003

> * Dean Scarff <q_fpness=omTV/> [2003-09-20 16:12:14 +0800]:
> On Fri, 19 Sep 2003 17:04:01 +0200, Corinna Vinschen wrote:
> >> shells: can be your login shell (
> would mean that all interpreters with a system interface (perl,
> python, cint, et al) would fall into the shell category as well

Do people use perl as their login shell?
if yes, then you might be right.
there _are_ people who actually have CLISP as their login shell.

> Sorry, but devel and interpreters should be enough for clisp imho.

while the shell category is, indeed, dubious, math is not (IMO).
clisp does offer quite a few features which make it a superset of bc
(which _is_ in math).

Sam Steingold ( running w2k
<> <> <>
<> <>
Warning! Dates in calendar are closer than they appear!

More information about the Cygwin-apps mailing list