doxygen 1.3.5 vs 1.2.18 (?)
Tue Jan 20 17:09:00 GMT 2004
Yes I've been dealing with some personal issues which mean I've done ...
pretty much nothing lately. No one should feel like they are waiting on me,
it'll probably be a little while before I redo my doxygen package. If
someone else does it first, that would be great. And while graphviz got the
votes, there was never a clear decision on the legal status, and I havent
yet done the obvious thing and attempted to follow it up with the graphviz
FWIW I did manage to get upstream to patch the doxygen textmode bug, I just
havent done anything since then.
PS: I realise there is a new version of aspell, and a beta of nano to
consider - I'll get round to looking at them shortly, I hope!
> -----Original Message-----
> From: firstname.lastname@example.org [mailto:email@example.com]
> On Behalf Of Jörg Schaible
> Sent: Wednesday, 21 January 2004 3:15 AM
> To: CygWin-Apps
> Subject: RE: doxygen 1.3.5 vs 1.2.18 (?)
> Lapo Luchini wrote on Tuesday, January 20, 2004 4:26 PM:
> > -----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-----
> > Hash: SHA1
> > Hi,
> > I'm just curious about work on a "newer" doxygen package: is
> > it under way? there are reasons not to?
> Original maintainer has been disappeared long ago. Gareth Pearce once
> wanted to take over and sent also an ITP for the related graphviz, but
> I've not heard anything from him about these packages for some months,
> too. So ...
> > of course "I don't
> > have time" and/or "1.3 is not a stable branch" are perfectly good
> > reasons ^_^)
More information about the Cygwin-apps