Coreutils musings...
Christopher Faylor
cgf-no-personal-reply-please@cygwin.com
Wed Mar 10 05:20:00 GMT 2004
On Wed, Mar 10, 2004 at 12:17:30AM -0500, Mark Blackburn wrote:
>Mark Blackburn wrote:
>
>>I tried compiling coreutils-5.2.0 and I didn't see many problems with
>>that. Another problem I see is that coreutils will cause conflicts
>>with other packages: textutils, sh-utils and fileutils. Obviously
>>coreutils is intended to replace these packages so these packages
>>would need to be withdrawn if coreutils was included with cygwin.
>
>Feel free to ignore this posting.
>
>I didn't search the archives for coreutils before sending this message
>(sorry). I was mainly looking for confirmation that coreutils was
>intended to replace all three of the *utils packages and it's obvious
>from the archives that this is the case.
>
>I'll research the archives more thoroughly before posting about
>coreutils again.
Not to be too pedantic or anything (but when did that ever stop me) but
the only applicable message about coreutils in cygwin-apps is really an
ITP. Anything else is off-topic since coreutils isn't currently a
cygwin package.
I'll gladly waive the moratorium for a new coreutils package.
cgf
More information about the Cygwin-apps
mailing list