Pending Packages List, 2004-03-13

[John Morrison]

> From: Christopher Faylor
> 
> On Tue, Mar 16, 2004 at 08:36:43PM -0000, John Morrison wrote:
> >>From: Christopher Faylor
> >>I don't know.  I think I like Igor's more draconian approach better.  I
> >>might even go so far as to say that there should be only one ITP at a
> >>time unless there is a demonstrated need for other interrelated
> >>packages.
> >
> >Even then, it might be a good idea to only have one package ITP at a
> >time, but to state _why_ this package is needed?  (ie, ITP help2man
> >Required for future ITP gtypist)
> 
> That would be the "demonstrated need".

Oops sorry Chris, missed that.

J.