gnome 2.8.0 and external dependencies
Gerrit P. Haase
gp@familiehaase.de
Wed Sep 22 22:21:00 GMT 2004
Hello Yaakov,
>> We are missing some of them:
>> libfam
>> libgpg-error
>> libgcrypt
>> libtasn1
>> opencdk
>> gnutls
>> libgsf
>> mozilla
>>
>> I think we can skip libfam and mozilla for now;)
> I really wonder how many of the others are needed up front, or only for
> one or two applications which come after the desktop is built.
I have them ready packaged so there should be no problems. And Volker
takes over the GPG parts (gpg-error, gcrypt) and will try to build gnupg
on top of them.
> I have libgsf on my project page.
Fine, then I don't care about this one;)
>> Wait for announcements of:
>> libxml2
>> libxslt
>> gtk-doc
>> glib
Oops, I missed to announce gtk-doc, it was already uploaded.
>> then you can come with:
>> libIDL
>> ORBit2
> libIDL is already up to date (0.8.3-2 = 0.8.4); I'll see what I can do
> about ORBit2-2.12.0.
Well, I think I can try the GConf build also with the previous
versions. What I've seen so far the major change in most of the
packages is the version bump;)
>> and I'll follow with:
>> intltool
>> libbonobo
>> pango
>> atk
>> gtk+
> Most of these don't have major updates, if I recall, and libbonobo still
> needs to be added.
I have already atk and pango ready for upload, preparing gtk and
libbonobo currently.
>> and then we'll try to get GConf up and running...
> I think that should be the focus, rather than some of those other
> "prereqs" which aren't needed for libgnomeui-2 and the basic desktop.
Now after Charles found this great fix it should work, at least that I
can debug the problems which wasn't possible without downgrading the
compiler or some other ugly workarounds.
>> The rest is listed in the new "GNOME 2.8 Installation Order" list:
>> http://www.gnome.org/start/2.8/notes/rninstallation.html
> Well, I still have a pending ITP on libglade, and I could build
> libgnomecanvas and libwnck 2.8 soon I think.
> What I see to be a real problem is the speed of the ITP process; I have
You can upload libglade without waiting for three votes, and I think
your packages are always usable, so no review is needed, wasn't that
already posted by Corinna too?
> generally seen very little response to my Gnome-related packages, and
> I've had to ask each time for an exemption due to lack of response. I
> know these libraries aren't very exciting by themselves, but just the
> Gnome desktop needs about 30 packages to be operational. With the lag
> time on these ITPs and upload requests (I don't have upload privileges
> on cygwin.com), together with the problems with GConf, we missed 2.6 and
> have to start trying with 2.8. I just hope we get everything up before
> 2.10 (or whatever they decide to call it).
Alright, I'll upload libglade soon.
> So my question is this: if there's a real commitment to get Gnome into
> the distro, what can we do to speed this process up? If you visit my
> project site, you can see how much I have (or had from 2.6) ready. I
> don't mind doing the work if we can get past this hurdle.
We can upload the most uncritical packages without stepping through all
the hurdles.
Gerrit
--
=^..^=
More information about the Cygwin-apps
mailing list