[ITP] Apache 2.0
Mon Jun 20 14:48:00 GMT 2005
On Mon, 20 Jun 2005, Max Bowsher wrote:
> Corinna Vinschen wrote:
> > On Jun 20 01:57, Max Bowsher wrote:
> > > There doesn't seem to be any particular consensus between Linux
> > > distros on whether the package should be called "apache2" or
> > > "httpd".
> > > I have chosen to follow the naming of the official tarball, and call
> > > it "httpd". (Red Hat/Fedora does the same, FWIW)
> > I like "apache2" better, FWIW.
> The assumption that package name == tarball stem name is somewhat
> implied by the generic-build-script system. It wouldn't be impossible to
> work around, but it would be a bit weird.
FWIW, adding the original tarball name after the "=" in the line that says
"export src_orig_pkg_name=" should do it. This will only make the GBS
unpack that particular tarball, and will do nothing to the name of the
resulting build directory.
> What should the filenames be?
> Like this:?
> Or, all httpd, but the package files produced are named apache2?
> I'll change the name if people really want, but it's not trivial.
If the above doesn't work right, I'd like to know about it. Thanks.
> > Besides from that, many thanks for packaging apache2!
> No problem, once I found myself using it on a daily basis, I knew it was
> time to get a package out there :-)
Hopefully, packaging the modules for apache2 will be easier than it was
for apache1... Sigh.
|\ _,,,---,,_ firstname.lastname@example.org
ZZZzz /,`.-'`' -. ;-;;,_ email@example.com
|,4- ) )-,_. ,\ ( `'-' Igor Pechtchanski, Ph.D.
'---''(_/--' `-'\_) fL a.k.a JaguaR-R-R-r-r-r-.-.-. Meow!
"The Sun will pass between the Earth and the Moon tonight for a total
Lunar eclipse..." -- WCBS Radio Newsbrief, Oct 27 2004, 12:01 pm EDT
More information about the Cygwin-apps