[ITP] Apache 2.0

Max Bowsher maxb@ukf.net
Tue Jun 21 21:45:00 GMT 2005

Igor Pechtchanski wrote:
> On Mon, 20 Jun 2005, Igor Pechtchanski wrote:
>> On Mon, 20 Jun 2005, Max Bowsher wrote:
>>> The assumption that package name == tarball stem name is somewhat
>>> implied by the generic-build-script system. It wouldn't be impossible to
>>> work around, but it would be a bit weird.
>> FWIW, adding the original tarball name after the "=" in the line that says
>> "export src_orig_pkg_name=" should do it.  This will only make the GBS
>> unpack that particular tarball, and will do nothing to the name of the
>> resulting build directory.
> Actually, that's not enough, sorry.  You'd also need to redefine "srcdir"
> (since otherwise it'll be assumed to be derived from the script name), and
> "opt_decomp" (just set it to "j").
>> If the above doesn't work right, I'd like to know about it.  Thanks.
> This still applies, though. :-)

Thanks, those helped me to find the appropriate parts of the script, however, it wasn't a full solution.

Instead, I found it better to override $BASEPKG, and tweak some other parts of the script slightly. I have sent a patch in a new 


More information about the Cygwin-apps mailing list