STL errors building setup with gcc 3.4.4
Mon Jun 27 21:42:00 GMT 2005
On Mon, 27 Jun 2005, Brian Dessent wrote:
> Brian Dessent wrote:
> > If you can reduce the offending parts down to a testcase that might be
> > helpful. Otherwise for the time being the workarounds of one or more of
> Here is the reduced testcase:
> #include <vector>
> #include <string>
> class OptionSet
> OptionSet ();
> std::vector<std::string> const &nonOptions() const;
> std::vector<std::string> nonoptions;
> nonoptions = std::vector<std::string> ();
> std::vector<std::string> const &
> OptionSet::nonOptions() const
> return nonoptions;
> You only get the warnings with -O2 (and -Wall since this isn't a default
> warning) which seems to lead me to believe that it does have to do with
> gcc deciding to inline the function.
Thanks a lot for doing this!
> I'm not a language lawyer, but it does appear that this really is a
> spurious warning. Should I file a PR?
Please do. There is no obvious reason why this should be the correct
|\ _,,,---,,_ email@example.com
ZZZzz /,`.-'`' -. ;-;;,_ firstname.lastname@example.org
|,4- ) )-,_. ,\ ( `'-' Igor Pechtchanski, Ph.D.
'---''(_/--' `-'\_) fL a.k.a JaguaR-R-R-r-r-r-.-.-. Meow!
"The Sun will pass between the Earth and the Moon tonight for a total
Lunar eclipse..." -- WCBS Radio Newsbrief, Oct 27 2004, 12:01 pm EDT
More information about the Cygwin-apps