keychain and bash up for grabs?
Thu Mar 3 21:08:00 GMT 2005
On Thu, Mar 03, 2005 at 09:56:10PM +0100, Corinna Vinschen wrote:
>On Mar 3 15:28, Christopher Faylor wrote:
>>It seems like we are missing maintainers for keychain and bash. There
>>have been bugs reported against each with no responses from
>>maintainers. Private email to the bash maintainer seems to bounce.
>>So, unless Corinna objects or there is a clarification of the status of
>>these packages by tomorrow, these packages are looking for someone to
>No objections as far as bash is concerned, this already takes too long.
>Just in case of keychain I think we should give Hack another two weeks
>>Any vict... volunteers?
>Karl M is interested to take over keychain, we discussed this on the
>cygwin ML already.
Yes, sorry. I wasn't paying as close attention to the keychain discussion
as I should have been.
However, the recent (inexplicable) report that the older keychain is
causing a crash (in bash???) makes me think that we can't wait that long
to get a new version released. I should have made that much clearer in
I knew that Karl might be interested and was hoping that Karl might be
reading this mailing list. Duh. Gee. I could actually have checked
Nope. He isn't. I'm bcc'ing him.
Do you really think we need to wait two weeks? When was the last time
Hack sent email to a cygwin mailing list? Maybe Karl would be willing
to make a new release with the understanding that Hack might want his
package back if he resurfaces again in the next two weeks? I would just
like to elminate a potential source of cygwin mailing list complaints.
More information about the Cygwin-apps