1st summary (was Re: [HEADSUP] ALL Maintainers, please reply.)

[Hack Kampbjorn]

Corinna Vinschen wrote:
> On Sep 23 12:40, Max Bowsher wrote:
> 
>>Hack Kampbjorn wrote:
>>
>>>Corinna Vinschen wrote:
>>>
>>>>On Sep 21 20:23, Hack Kampbjorn wrote:
>>>>
>>>>
>>>>>Hack Kampbjorn:
>>>>>keychain
>>>>>ncftp
>>>>>wget
>>>>>
>>>>>But my last windows computer at home is being hit by a deathstar battle
>>>>>station. And I will don't read cygwin mail at work even that I do have a
>>>>>windows desktop there where I use cygwin everyday.
>>>>
>>>>
>>>>Err... what does that mean?  wget is now Harold's, but what about the 
>>>>other
>>>>two packages?  Do you continue to maintain them or are they up for grabs?
>>>
>>>I continue to maintain them until somebody takes over
>>
>>How can you maintain them if you never have any free time with a cygwin 
>>computer? Or is that not what you are saying?
> 
> 
> I'd be interested to hear the answer, too.

It seems my attempt at humor was open for misunderstandings. I meant to 
say that my current Windows desktop at home is about to die as it's 
running with an IBM Deskstar 60 GB that has a known defect which earned 
it the nickname deathstar. Even when this happens I will have access to 
Windows systems but only at my work office. (The funny thing is that it 
would give me a service window of at least 8 hours a day which is more 
than I've ever spend at with a cygwin system at home)

What was only implied (at least I thought so) but not said was that when 
it does die my ability to maintain cygwin packages is less than optimal 
and I would not mind somebody else taking over before that time.

> 
> 
> Corinna
> 


-- 
Med venlig hilsen / Kind regards

Hack Kampbjørn