Do we still have a whois maintainer? (was Re: note to whois maintainer)

Lapo Luchini
Wed Sep 21 17:16:00 GMT 2005

Hash: SHA1

Corinna Vinschen wrote:
> Thank you very much!  Let's wait until end of the week, if Mark doesn't
> show up, feel free to create a new package.

Then... should I?
(I didn't notice any message from Mark, but then again I've been very
busy and the ML has been quite high traffic, so I may have missed it)

What about the fact that that advisory referred to a fact that is
probably so by design (but which I can *NOT* reproduce with actual
Cygwin version, which was updated just a few days AFTER the date of that
advisory message)?
If that is felt as a strong problem, we should probably evaluate using
FreeBSD's whois? Seems to be a bit less easy to use with some addresses,
and has way more options <>.

Either way suits me ;-)


- --
L a p o   L u c h i n i
l a p o @ l a p o . i t
w w w . l a p o . i t /
Version: GnuPG v1.4.1 (Cygwin)
Comment: Using GnuPG with Thunderbird -


More information about the Cygwin-apps mailing list