2nd summary (was Re: [HEADSUP] ALL Maintainers, please reply.)
Thu Sep 29 02:38:00 GMT 2005
Christopher Faylor wrote:
> On Wed, Sep 28, 2005 at 08:20:35PM -0400, Nicholas Wourms wrote:
>>> libpopt0 Christopher Faylor
>>> popt Christopher Faylor
>>Actually, that's my package
> I just took these because I thought they were related to rpm and I'm
> taking on rpm. So, sorry for the confusion.
Actually, Chris, Nicholas, this is the EXACT reasoning behind Nick's
original adoption of popt from me:
It "went with" rpm, which Nick was ITP'ing, so it made sense for him to
take over popt maintainership.
I think it still makes sense -- so if cgf has taken over rpm, IMO popt
maintainership should also go with it. But obviously, it's up to you guys.
More information about the Cygwin-apps