2nd summary (was Re: [HEADSUP] ALL Maintainers, please reply.)

[Charles Wilson]

Christopher Faylor wrote:
> On Wed, Sep 28, 2005 at 08:20:35PM -0400, Nicholas Wourms wrote:
> 
>>> libpopt0                       Christopher Faylor
>>> popt                           Christopher Faylor
>>
>>Actually, that's my package
> 
> 
> I just took these because I thought they were related to rpm and I'm
> taking on rpm.  So, sorry for the confusion.
> 

Actually, Chris, Nicholas, this is the EXACT reasoning behind Nick's 
original adoption of popt from me:
    http://cygwin.com/ml/cygwin-apps/2002-06/msg00069.html
It "went with" rpm, which Nick was ITP'ing, so it made sense for him to 
take over popt maintainership.

I think it still makes sense -- so if cgf has taken over rpm, IMO popt 
maintainership should also go with it.  But obviously, it's up to you guys.

--
Chuck