Defining some official package naming standards
Mon Aug 14 08:58:00 GMT 2006
Corinna Vinschen wrote:
> On Aug 12 23:13, Max Bowsher wrote:
>> The recent thread about remake suggests it would be a good idea to
>> define some actual official package naming rules: exactly what things
>> are considered valid for the name, version, and release fields in a package.
>> I propose:
>> A package NVR identifier is name-version-release - three fields
>> separated by '-' characters.
>> The release field MUST NOT contain a '-' character.
>> The version field MUST begin with a digit. Well-behaved parsers should
>> allow it to contain '-' characters, but package creators should try to
>> avoid this because it can lead to NVRs that look confusing.
>> The name field may contain '-' characters, EXCEPT that it MUST NOT
>> contain a '-' character immediately followed by a digit.
> Weird, but I always thought that the above is already state of the art.
The above is a set of rules distilled from current practice, but I don't
think we've actually defined and documented this before.
-------------- next part --------------
A non-text attachment was scrubbed...
Size: 188 bytes
Desc: OpenPGP digital signature
More information about the Cygwin-apps