Thu Jan 5 03:07:00 GMT 2006
On Thu, Jan 05, 2006 at 02:31:02AM +0100, Lapo Luchini wrote:
>Christopher Faylor wrote:
>> V??clav Haisman wrote:
>>> There is also FreeBSD package too. I support adding this package.
>I wonder who's crazy enough to mantain it. <giggle>
>> There is no reason to vote on the package if there is already a
>> linux reference distribution. FreeBSD is not relevant in this case.
>What is missing, in this case, is a good old review of the packaging
>itself, if my internal memory is not yet ready for the trash...
Right. We still need a GTG.
>> Are there any volunteers who would be willing to modernize
>> http://cygwin.com/setup.html to make this policy clear?
>I see the it isn't outdated, that part it's just missing. ;)
>I'll try to write something tomorrow and post it on the list.
I suspect that there are parts of the page which could use some updating
which is why I couched the request more general terms but, yes, the
"new" rules should be spelled out there.
More information about the Cygwin-apps