Please test: ctags-5.6-1
Wed Jun 7 07:35:00 GMT 2006
Dr. Volker Zell wrote:
> Builds fine, GTG.
Thanks for testing it!
> Why don't you use cygport, it'll help in the long run ?
I haven't been paying close attention to it. I thought it was still
considered experimental. Are you endorsing it for general use, then?
I had bad luck with g-b-s when I first tried to package ctags, so I went
into the packaging process wary about using others' tools. But now that
I have something that works, I have a fallback position, so I'm more
willing to experiment.
I believe my problems with g-b-s were due to the fact that ctags uses
autoconf only, no automake. Do you know of anyone using cygport with
such a package?
More information about the Cygwin-apps