Please test: ctags-5.6-1

[Warren Young]

Dr. Volker Zell wrote:
> 
> Builds fine, GTG.

Thanks for testing it!

> Why don't you use cygport, it'll help in the long run ?

I haven't been paying close attention to it.  I thought it was still 
considered experimental.  Are you endorsing it for general use, then?

I had bad luck with g-b-s when I first tried to package ctags, so I went 
into the packaging process wary about using others' tools.  But now that 
I have something that works, I have a fallback position, so I'm more 
willing to experiment.

I believe my problems with g-b-s were due to the fact that ctags uses 
autoconf only, no automake.  Do you know of anyone using cygport with 
such a package?