[ITP] util-linux

Yaakov S (Cygwin Ports) yselkowitz@users.sourceforge.net
Thu Mar 2 22:06:00 GMT 2006


-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-----
Hash: SHA1

Eric Blake wrote:
> No.  With Corinna's patch to add CYGWIN=transparent_exe option, we are
> asking for problems if we distribute a script alongside an exe.  (I've
> been meaning to check for any other violations of the idea of providing
> more than one file in the set {foo, foo.exe, foo.lnk, foo.exe.lnk}, since
> I would like to see transparent_exe gain more light).

OK, but I can think of one *major* "violation" of this: libtool-built
applications, when linking against a to-be-installed library in the same
package.  In such a case, the real .exe is placed in .libs, and both an
extension-less libtool script  and a launcher .exe are placed in the
builddir; this allows one to run the application w/o installing it.


Yaakov
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-----
Version: GnuPG v1.4.1 (Cygwin)
Comment: Using GnuPG with Mozilla - http://enigmail.mozdev.org

iD8DBQFEB2xtpiWmPGlmQSMRAl4KAJ9etjDQmJLxykewiZPybDT5itx6oACg9Dgr
7JMp86OzTcvKk+9JVYDV1kc=
=nj/K
-----END PGP SIGNATURE-----



More information about the Cygwin-apps mailing list